Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00556
Original file (BC 2014 00556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00556
 					COUNSEL:  NONE
					HEARING DESIRED:  YES 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be amended to show he was awarded the Military Outstanding 
Volunteer Service Medal (MOVSM). 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He received the MOVSM after his review of his DD Form 214.  He 
thought his DD Form 214 would be automatically updated to 
reflect the award but learned later that he would have to submit 
his request to the Board.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 1 Feb 13, the applicant was retired.  He was credited with 
28 years, 4 months and 2 days of active duty service.  

The MOVSM, authorized by Executive Order 12830 on 9 Jan 93, may 
be awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces and Reserve 
components, who subsequent to 31 Dec 92 perform outstanding 
volunteer community service of a sustained, direct and 
consequential nature. 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial.  After a thorough review of the 
applicant’s official military personnel record, DPSID was unable 
to verify award of the MOVSM.  Although the applicant provided a 
copy of his Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF) printout 
showing the award, a source document could not be located 
verifying the award.  The source documentation for verification 
of the MOVSM is a signed approval memorandum from the delegated 
approval authority.  To grant relief would be contrary to the 
criteria established by DODM 1348.33, Manual of Military 
Decorations and Awards, the Secretary of the Air Force and Chief 
of Staff.


The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

He contacted SAF/PA, the office that awarded him the MOVSM.  
They only had an unsigned copy of the memorandum; however, they 
provided a Memorandum for Record (MFR) that states the SAF/PA 
Director had signed the memorandum awarding him the MOVSM.  The 
award authority has retired and he has been unable to contact 
him.  

He knows the award was processed as his vMPF awards and 
decorations record was updated.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit D.  


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We note 
DPSID recommends denial stating they were unable to locate a 
source document verifying the award of the MOVSM.  However, we 
find the MFR from the SAF/PA Director of Staff dated 4 Jun 14, 
stating the award authority had signed the memorandum awarding 
the applicant the MOVSM and the 30 Jan 13 vMPF printout 
sufficient to substantiate the applicant’s request for award of 
the MOVSM.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be 
corrected as indicated below.  

4.  The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issue involved.  
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.  


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the DD 
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, 
issued in conjunction with his 31 Jan 13 retirement be amended 
in item 13, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign 
Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, to include the Military 
Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal.  


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00556 in Executive Session on 20 Nov 14 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	 , Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 31 Jan 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 25 Mar 14.  
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, 8 May 14.  
	Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.    

						

 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03892

    Original file (BC 2014 03892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. While there is no specific time period to qualify for the MOVSM (for example 500 hours of community service within 24 calendar months), approval authorities shall ensure the service to be honored...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00301

    Original file (BC 2014 00301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00301 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal (MOVSM). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While on active duty, he completed over 2,000 hours of volunteer service to the community, which merited award of the MOVSM. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00717

    Original file (BC 2014 00717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In preparation for the Air Force Reduction in Force Boards, she reviewed her records and noticed that two of her AFAMs reflect “First Oak Leaf Cluster”. They may not be awarded Defense/Joint decorations. The JSCM will not be awarded for any period of service for which a Military Department medal is awarded.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03194

    Original file (BC 2013 03194.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C and D. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating the special order officially authorizing him award of the AFAM has not been provided or located within his official military record. The AFAM was no longer reflected in the promotion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04324

    Original file (BC 2013 04324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is the highest level of administrative appeal within the Department of the Air Force. The applicant did file an appeal through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluations Reports; however, the ERAB considered the appeal and after a thorough review, it was returned without action due to a lack of corroborating evidence to clearly prove that the lower...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc 2013 02373

    Original file (bc 2013 02373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was awarded several ribbons/devices for his time on active duty and in the Air Force Reserves. DoD 1348-33, Volume 2, Manual of Military Decorations and Awards: DoD Service Awards - Campaign, Expeditionary, and Service Medals states the following: HSM may be awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who, subsequent to 1 Apr 75, distinguished themselves as individuals or as members of U.S. military units or ships, by meritorious, direct participation in a significant military act, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00335

    Original file (BC 2013 00335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 Feb 04, the applicant’s commander denied him award of the AFGCM for the period 2 Jan 02 through 16 Jul 03. On 13 May 13, AFPC/DPSIDR issued an administrative correction to the applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, changing “AFGCM w/2BOLCs” to read “AFGCM w/4BOLCs,” and changing “AFOR-LT w/3BOLCs” to read “AFOR-LT w/4/BOLCs).” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00058

    Original file (BC 2014 00058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOO recommends approval for SSB consideration, indicating that while AFPC/DPSID cannot locate a special order verifying the JSCM was awarded to the applicant, the fact the applicant has provided what appears to be an authentic signed certificate, with a Given Under My Hand date of 9 Jan 09, and a citation with official seal, the citation should be filed in the applicant’s officer selection record (OSR), updated on his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03059

    Original file (BC 2014 03059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03059 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to add the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: a. The applicant’s DD Form 214s reflects the award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - National Defense Service Medal - Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon - Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00323

    Original file (BC 2014 00323.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove his N-O PRF for the PO513A CSB and replace it with an updated version, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Once a file is accepted for record, only strong evidence to the contrary warrants correction or removal from the record. While the Board notes the applicant’s letter of support from the ACC/CC, we believe it would be inappropriate for...